In this opinion piece, Doctor Nahshon Perez explores the complexities of managing contested sacred sites—locations of deep religious significance to multiple groups that often lead to disputes and violence. Perez introduces a typology of five governance models to address the challenges these “thick sites” present. The models include:

  1. Non-Intervention – The state refrains from managing religious aspects and focuses on security and maintenance.
  2. Divide and Separate – The site is divided to minimize contact between competing groups.
  3. Preference – One group is given priority in site management.
  4. Status Quo – Existing arrangements are preserved without change.
  5. Closure – Access or religious practice is restricted to maintain order.

Dr. Perez highlights the utility of these models for decision-makers, scholars, and religious leaders in managing and resolving conflicts at sacred sites. If you’d like to delve deeper into the specifics of these models and their real-world applications, click here to read the full article.